Non Economic Arguments

1. Defense: From the standpoint of national defense each country should be self sufficient as far as possible. It should avoid too much dependence upon other countries even if such avoidance involves an economic loss. Defense is better than opulence. Therefore it is essential to make a country militarily stung even though it may not be economically prosperous. No nation can prosper if its defense is weak. And defense goods producing industries cannot develop unless they are protected.

This policy of economic nationalism of any country therefore is called beg gar-my-neighbor policy a country cannot prosper by impoverishing other neighbouring countries. It will be suicidal and will ho against the country in the future. As a result of beggar my neighbor policy adopted by countries and consequent retaliation, all will be worse off than before they began international trade will of labour will be lost to the world. Once the beggar my neighbor polices breed their made to bring them into international trade organisation and agreements were entered into for keeping the international trade3 free form any restrictions. However, it has yet to be freed form a number of restrictions.

2. Patriotism: Protection is essential to arouse and satisfy patriotism of the people. If the duty of every citizen to prefer homemade (Swedish) good to foreign goods. As such homemade goods should be available in the right quantity and quality. This is not possible without such home industries being developed with the aid of protection.

3. Preservation: Protection has been advocated in some countries for the purpose of preserivingcertin classes of population or cretin occupation. This argument was particularly applied to agriusltuation duties to the preservation of an agricultural community of goring industry of the country for political and social reasons. The agricultural community was always considered to be an important part of the society whose interests were affected by the import of cheap food grains from outside. Protection was advocated to maintain the price of agriculture at a high level. Tariff duties should preserve peasant class in large number and in prosperity as it is the backbone of the society. European countries also faced the situation of falling price because of import of cheap food grains form austral is a tariff duty on import of food grains. In England for instance Corn Laws imposed tariffs (in 1819) on wheat to maintain the price levels during the Napoleonic wars and to prevent the collages f grain production and save the pleasantly.  It was after a period of some 27 years. In 1846, that the Corn Laws were abolished and England trade was made free.

Similarly, when in other European countries also price tended to all because of import of cheap food grains form. Australia, congaed etc. agriculturists interests began to suffer hence these countries too resorted to tariff duty on the import of food grains.

Services: - Non-Economic Arguments Homework | Non-Economic Arguments Homework Help | Non-Economic Arguments Homework Help Services | Live Non-Economic Arguments Homework Help | Non-Economic Arguments Homework Tutors | Online Non-Economic Arguments Homework Help | Non-Economic Arguments Tutors | Online Non-Economic Arguments Tutors | Non-Economic Arguments Homework Services | Non-Economic Arguments